Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 599 Download : 324

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The enactment of the Law Number 30 Year 2014 regarding Government Administration with the expansion of Administrative Court competence stimulate confusion and obstacles in norms and theoretical also practical obstacles for the justice enforcers especially Administrative Court Judges. On the other hand, this law is contrary and potentially conflict with Government Administration Law. To resolve this legal problem, Indonesia Supreme Court issuing several Supreme Court Regulation and Circular Letter of Supreme Court for each expansion of Administrative Court competence otherwise the confusion and obstacle in theoretical and practical spheres still conducted the problem for the justice enforcers. This study has aims to analyze and discuss concerning confusion and obstacles faced by enforcers especially Administrative Court Judges and the attitude or solution towards those obstacles. This study is using normative and empirical method with qualitative types as a descriptive analysis article.

Keywords

Administrative Court Law Government Administration Law Norms and Theoretical Obstacles Practical Obstacles

Article Details

References

  1. Bedner, Adriaan. “Indonesian Legal Scholarship and Jurisprudence as an Obstacle for Transplanting Legal Institutions.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 5, no. 2 (2013): 253–73.
  2. Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna. “Lawsuit in Administrative Court after Administrative Proceedings Based on Perma No. 6 Of 2018.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 2019. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.8.3.2019.458-480.
  3. Butt, Simon. “Freedom of Information Law and Its Application in Indonesia: A Preliminary Assessment.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 8 (2013): 1–42.
  4. Butt, Simon, and Sofie Arjon Schütte. “Assessing Judicial Performance in Indonesia: The Court for Corruption Crimes.” Crime, Law and Social Change 62, no. 5 (2014): 603–19.
  5. Hadjon, Philipus M. “Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Konteks Undang-Undang No. 30 Th. 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 4, no. 1 (2015): 51–64. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.51-64.
  6. Hasil Penelitian Unggulan Udayana. “Perluasan Kompetensi Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undag Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Adminitrasi Pemerintahan Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Sistem Hukum Acara Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.” LPPM Universitas Udayana, 2018.
  7. HR, Ridwan, Despan Heryansyah, SHI., MH., and Dian Kus Pratiwi, SH., MH. “Perluasan Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 2018. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss2.art7.
  8. “Interview Results at The State Administrative Court,” n.d.
  9. Jiwantara, Firzhal Arzhi, Huala Adolf, Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo, and R R Cahyowati. “The Extension of Absolute Competence of State Administrative Court after the Enactment of Act Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration in Indonesia.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 21, no. 2 (2018): 1–11.
  10. Machmudin, Dudu Duswara. “Modernization and Acceleration Of Case Standard Handling and Reviewing on Indonesia Supreme Court.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 21, no. 3 (2018): 1–7.
  11. Petroski, Karen. “Legal Fictions and the Limits of Legal Language.” International Journal of Law in Context 9, no. 4 (2013): 485–505.
  12. Putrijanti, Aju. “Kewenangan Serta Obyek Sengketa Di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Setelah Ada Uu No. 30 / 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 44, no. 4 (2015): 425. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.44.4.2015.425-430.
  13. Soehartono. “Eksistensi Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Sebagai Dasar Pengujian Keabsahan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 2 (2012): 180–93. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v1i2.10644.
  14. Tri Cahya Indra Permana. “Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan Ditinjau Dari Segi Access To Justice.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 2015.
  15. Wibisana, Andri Gunawan. “Menulis Di Jurnal Hukum: Gagasan, Struktur, Dan Gaya.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 2019. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no2.2014.
  16. Widya Utama, Kartika. “Quo Vadis Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Jis. Undang-Undang No 51 Tahun 2009 Dan Kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Uu. No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum, no. 3 (2015): 356–63. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.44.3.2015.356-363.